Difference between revisions of "Urbanisation"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
==Enablers:==
==Enablers:==


Manufacturing, Traffic, natural catastrophes, population, economic growth
Manufacturing, Traffic, [[Catastrophes - Acts of God]], population, economic growth
==Inhibitors:==
==Inhibitors:==


Line 22: Line 22:
Experts are arguing if urbanization really drives global warming. On the one side the people moving to cities often times live in areas (like slums) with bad or almost no infrastructure. Therefore they are not only easier affected by natural catastrophes (like storms, floods etc.) but also much less efficient in using resources.
Experts are arguing if urbanization really drives global warming. On the one side the people moving to cities often times live in areas (like slums) with bad or almost no infrastructure. Therefore they are not only easier affected by natural catastrophes (like storms, floods etc.) but also much less efficient in using resources.
On the other side people like Steward Brand argue that the falling birth rate from families moving to cities avoids overpopulation.<br>
On the other side people like Steward Brand argue that the falling birth rate from families moving to cities avoids overpopulation.<br>
 
In terms of fighting global warming cities are gaining importance since more than 50% of world population live in cities. To attract inhabitants cities try to be more attractive becoming greener and improve their infrastructure. (see: [[Initiative from cities]])
==Experts==
==Experts==



Latest revision as of 18:22, 31 August 2010