Difference between revisions of "The Globalization of Culture (or Cultural Globalization)"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 6: Line 6:
== Enablers ==
== Enablers ==
- Acceptance of cheap entertainment from the US for syndication
- Acceptance of cheap entertainment from the US for syndication
- Loosening of old traditions and cultural structures
- Loosening of old traditions and cultural structures
- High costs for complete local programming
- High costs for complete local programming

Revision as of 19:22, 3 December 2004

Description:

In the last 50 years the US culture has dominated much of the global electronic culture. Its entertainment industry – film, TV and music – is worth millions of dollars in profits annually, but once it is syndicated globally – these returns are in the billions (unfortunately I haven’t been able to find exact figures on this). A byproduct of this proliferation is a huge impact of the American lifestyle and personal value system on cultures that are both remote from the US geographically and culturally. Consuming the products of this industry results in a consistent change of the indigenous culture’s values, affecting its language, its social structure and even its appearance (from clothes and cars to billboards and advertisements). The Cold War supplied the US with enough reasons to push its value system using this industry outside the boundaries of the Western World. But now that has turned into Consumerism and Globalization, all following the US dogma, simply because people are being bombarded, in their homes, with images of what they mean the US. That in the end causes indigenous cultures to lose their identity and as a result many countries are doomed to follow Consumerism in the US model, ravaging along the way cultures that are slowly and silently becoming extinct.

Enablers

- Acceptance of cheap entertainment from the US for syndication

- Loosening of old traditions and cultural structures - High costs for complete local programming - Internet advertising and information - Satellite TV - Advertising of imported products - Content of TV/films/music that perpetuates further consumption of US products and brands

Inhibitors

- Localized programming - Limiting syndicated programming - Creating local brands that celebrate locality instead of globalization - Education - Support of indigenous culture by local governments and NGOs

Paradigms

The US creates the entertainment products, sells them abroad, and they perpetuate US-based model for a society. Individuals are self-brainwashed by these to accept this model and further consume that culture’s products.

Experts

Anthropologists

Timing

In 2010 various programming agencies get together to formulate alternatives to US entertainment. By 2015 90% of the programming around the world is originating from the US. Local cinema industries, with few European exceptions along with India and China, are producing a very small percentage of the movies shown in each country. A growing number of languages used around the world is adopting more and more English terms instead of using their own words to describe words that originate in the US.

Web Resources

Globalization of Culture - to what End? A "Marxisit" (i.e. critical) View of the problem

The Globalization of Culture Part of a paper that explains the problem

The International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA) is a private sector coalition formed in 1984 to represent the U.S. copyright-based industries in bilateral and multilateral efforts to improve international protection of copyrighted materials.


To see UNESCO’s view on the subject

About Indigenous languages under threat