Talk:Group Log

Hi ladies,

I also think that we have to focus on intellectual property concerning open source and open content. Actually, I think that the term "intellectual property" has everything to do with open source and open content, that it has come into existence only after the arrival of open source and open content...? As the idea of open source and open content is all about sharing and interactively using knowledge and sources, the concern arises about whose property a particular source, document is (is it the publisher's, the last editor's or is it everyone's property?). What I'm trying to say here is more or less the same as the others, that in a way intellectual property is derived from open source and open content. They are too closely related to be considered seperatly. I'm not so sure if there are other topics in web 2.0 where intellectual property have to be considered as well. But even if there is, I think we should only stick to the intellectual property of the topics agreed on so far.

If anybody disagrees or thinks otherwise, please feel free to make it known :)

greetz, Ashwina