Difference between revisions of "Scenario Quality Ranking"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
Leisure in 2010
Leisure in 2010
Distance Education in 2010
Distance Education in 2010
    Reasons: Easy to read, nice framework, it goes to the point
Branding in 2005
Branding in 2005
Workspace in 2010
Workspace in 2010
Food Retailing in 2006
Food Retailing in 2006
    Reasons: Focused on Alberthein in Netherlands too narrow, Difficult to read, Not very revolutionary ideas
Electronic Cash in 2010
Electronic Cash in 2010
Telecommunications in 2003
Telecommunications in 2003

Revision as of 16:46, 2 November 2004

Group 1

Group 2
BEST Human Relationships in 2015

   Reasons: Original, easy to understand, linkage between elements

Telecommunications in 2015 Leisure in 2010 Distance Education in 2010

   Reasons: Easy to read, nice framework, it goes to the point

Branding in 2005 Workspace in 2010 Food Retailing in 2006

   Reasons: Focused on Alberthein in Netherlands too narrow, Difficult to read, Not very revolutionary ideas

Electronic Cash in 2010 Telecommunications in 2003 Internet in 2005

   Reasons: Unoriginal, not forward looking enough, no linkage between elements, badly organized

WORST

Group 3

Group 4

Group 5

Group 6