Difference between revisions of "OPEC"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
=background=
=background=
1. OPEC?s role in G77 has been simultaneously positive and negative: positive in so far as it brings
1. OPEC's role in G77 has been simultaneously positive and negative: positive in so far as it brings
to G77 a large team of experienced lawyers and negotiators; negative in so far as OPEC is largely
to G77 a large team of experienced lawyers and negotiators; negative in so far as OPEC is largely
concerned with the impact of climate policies on their oil export and revenues rather than in
concerned with the impact of climate policies on their oil export and revenues rather than in
Line 16: Line 16:
4.overall OPEC has become
4.overall OPEC has become
more dependent with an average of 27% of GDP coming from oil exports.<br><br>
more dependent with an average of 27% of GDP coming from oil exports.<br><br>
5. [[File:OPEC Member GPD%.jpeg]][http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/ASB2009.pdf OPEC annual statistic report 2009]
5. [[File:OPEC Member GPD%.jpeg]]<br>[http://www.opec.org/opec_web/static_files_project/media/downloads/publications/ASB2009.pdf OPEC annual statistic report 2009]<br><br>
6. OPEC in the UNFCCC:<BR>
Representatives of these countries consequently emphasized the
scientific uncertainty about climate change and the flaws in existing economic analysis. They
went to great lengths to minimise any specific commitments to emissions reductions, avoid any
reference to energy and generally to delay the conclusion of an agreement.<BR><BR>
7. [[File:OPEC and Climate change agreement.jpg]]

Revision as of 10:49, 22 August 2010

background

1. OPEC's role in G77 has been simultaneously positive and negative: positive in so far as it brings to G77 a large team of experienced lawyers and negotiators; negative in so far as OPEC is largely concerned with the impact of climate policies on their oil export and revenues rather than in reducing greenhouse gas emissions or in developing policies and measures to facilitate adaptation.OPEC and in particular Saudi Arabia have close associations with the oil industry, in particular US companies. This has led them to oppose greenhouse gas reductions, disrupt the whole negotiation process[1]

2.In 1976, OPEC member countries established the OPEC Fund for International Development, a multilateral development finance institution aimed at promoting cooperation between OPEC and other developing countries, in particular the least developed countries (LDCs). It does this mainly by providing financial resources to assist the latter group of countries in their economic and social advancement.

3.In 2003, OPEC countries accounted for 77% of proved oil reserves in the world and roughly 40% of its production.

4.overall OPEC has become more dependent with an average of 27% of GDP coming from oil exports.

5. OPEC Member GPD%.jpeg
OPEC annual statistic report 2009

6. OPEC in the UNFCCC:
Representatives of these countries consequently emphasized the scientific uncertainty about climate change and the flaws in existing economic analysis. They went to great lengths to minimise any specific commitments to emissions reductions, avoid any reference to energy and generally to delay the conclusion of an agreement.

7. File:OPEC and Climate change agreement.jpg