Difference between revisions of "Important Criteria of Judging a scenario"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li> | <li>Focused --> identify stakeholders (connected with now)</li> | ||
<li>Value for organization</li> | <li>Value for organization</li> | ||
<li> | <li>Realistic <-- quality of analysis & research</li> | ||
<li> | <li>Relevance of driving forces</li> | ||
<li>Originality of research <-- google quotes </li> | <li>Originality of research <-- google quotes </li> | ||
<li> | <li>Plausible & surprising </li> | ||
<li> | <li>Sequential / rational, logical, based on research </li> | ||
<li> | <li>Show system diagrams </li> | ||
<li> | <li>Appropriate naming/labeling of different scenarios </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:26, 23 February 2007
- Focused --> identify stakeholders (connected with now)
- Value for organization
- Realistic <-- quality of analysis & research
- Relevance of driving forces
- Originality of research <-- google quotes
- Plausible & surprising
- Sequential / rational, logical, based on research
- Show system diagrams
- Appropriate naming/labeling of different scenarios