Difference between revisions of "ISP Snooping"

From ScenarioThinking
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
* high costs
* high costs
* opposition from ISPs
* opposition from ISPs
* ability to secure data
* users can encrypt data


==Paradigms:==
==Paradigms:==

Revision as of 22:26, 5 March 2007

<< back to 'Technological Driving Forces for the Future of Privacy'

Description:

Internet Service Provider (ISP) snooping refers to proposed mandatory requirements to retain records of everything citizens do online. Archives of each individual’s online activities would be automatically retained for law enforcement in logs that would span up to two years. Only the oldest records would be purged at the end of the retainment period, while new online activities would continuously build the archives. The proposed requirement, known as data retention, is a controversial measure that opens the door to a host of concerns for ISPs and privacy advocates alike.

Enablers:

Inhibitors:

  • public opposition
  • high costs
  • opposition from ISPs
  • users can encrypt data

Paradigms:

Experts:

Timing:

1994
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act.
June 2005
Justice Department officials quietly propose data retention rules.
December 2005
European Parliament votes for data retention of up to two years.
April 14, 2006
Data retention proposals surface in Colorado and the U.S. Congress.
April 20, 2006
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says data retention "must be addressed."
April 28, 2006
Democrat proposes data retention amendment, followed by a Republican.
May 26, 2006
Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller pressure Internet and telecom companies.
September 26, 2006
Politicians suggest that Web hosts and registrars might have to comply. Search engines are also mentioned.
January 18, 2007
Gonzales says administration will ask Congress for new laws.
February 6, 2007
Republicans introduce mandatory data retention "Safety Act."

Web Resources: