Difference between revisions of "2. What is the superiorities comparing with other Technologies; WCDMA, WiMAX, WiFi, CDMA Ev-DO?"

Revision as of 10:52, 18 July 2006

Comparing with other technologies, the advangages of Wibro are;

> it's the superiority comparing with WCDMA, WiMAX, WiFi and CDMA because the compatibility with WiMAX is itself that most operators wanst.

> WCDMA and CDMA is not packet services, these are the service with the curcuit-oriented networks. For the data services, Wibro is superior.

> Channelization is the characteristic of the digital system. But for QoS point of view, Wibro is designed basically for this.

> Most superior than any others

> Comparing with WCDMA, CDMA, Wibro has low latency architecture.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The advangages of Wibro;
+Comparing with other technologies, the advangages of Wibro are;
 * Optimized for and backwards compatible with fixed stations
-* Packet-oriented architecture
+> it's the superiority comparing with WCDMA, WiMAX, WiFi and CDMA because the compatibility with WiMAX is itself that most operators wanst.
+* Packet-oriented architecture
+> WCDMA and CDMA is not packet services, these are the service with the curcuit-oriented networks. For the data services, Wibro is superior.
 * Channelization and control for multimedia services with QoS
+> Channelization is the characteristic of the digital system. But for QoS point of view, Wibro is designed basically for this.
 * High efficiency data UL and DL
+> Most superior than any others
 * Low latency architecture
+> Comparing with WCDMA, CDMA, Wibro has low latency architecture.
 [[Image:802-3G.JPG]]