Difference between revisions of "Increase/Decrease of individual and democratic rights and freedoms"
Mpospisilik (talk | contribs) |
Mpospisilik (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the population | Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the population | ||
because democratic representation and freedom of expression enables citizens to have a say in where revenues go | |||
Innovation | Innovation | ||
because individual freedoms and freedom of expression will enable more collaboration and sharing of ideas | |||
Recognition of minority views | Recognition of minority views | ||
because minorities will have the freedom to express their views and to support those views with votes | |||
Political dissent | Political dissent | ||
because dissenters will have the freedom to express their views | |||
Greater difficulty reaching consensus, more public deliberation and therefore relatively slow implementation of national policies | Greater difficulty reaching consensus, more public deliberation and therefore relatively slow implementation of national policies | ||
a greater variety of views, and greater recognition of minority views will inevitably make it more difficult to reach consensus | |||
e.g. greater difficulty in implementing difficult/controversial/unpopular policies | |||
Emphasis of public benefit relative to national strategic interest | Emphasis of public benefit relative to national strategic interest | ||
national strategic interest is prioritized by politicians and the military | |||
the public benefit is prioritized by average citizens | |||
greater individual freedom and democratic participation will enable average citizens to express and vote for their priorities | |||
e.g. less effectiveness in leveraging resources for national strategic interest; greater use of natural resources for public benefit | |||
Line 53: | Line 59: | ||
Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the an elite | Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the an elite | ||
because lack of democratic representation and freedom of expression enables political and business elites to exercise greater control over revenues | |||
Less innovation | Less innovation | ||
Lack of individual freedoms and freedom of expression will inhibit collaboration and sharing of ideas | |||
Less recognition of minority views | Less recognition of minority views | ||
because minorities will lack the freedom to express their views and to support those views with votes | |||
Less toleration of dissent | Less toleration of dissent | ||
because dissenters will have the freedom to express their views | |||
Greater ease in reaching consensus | Greater ease in reaching consensus | ||
Since fewer views are expressed or enforced by votes, consensus is easily reached by those in power | |||
Less public deliberation and therefore relatively quick implementation of national policies | Less public deliberation and therefore relatively quick implementation of national policies | ||
a smaller variety of views, and less recognition of minority views will inevitably make it easier to reach consensus from among a narrower range of options | |||
e.g. greater ease in implementing difficult/controversial/unpopular policies | |||
Emphasis of national strategic interest relative to public benefit | Emphasis of national strategic interest relative to public benefit | ||
national strategic interest is prioritized by politicians and the military | |||
the public benefit is prioritized by average citizens | |||
less individual freedom and democratic participation will enable politicians and the military to implement policies in line with their own priorities | |||
e.g. greater effectiveness in leveraging resources for national strategic interest; less use of natural resources for public benefit |
Revision as of 12:15, 29 September 2009
Increase/Decrease of individual and democratic rights and freedoms
This force could obviously move in one of two directions:
1) Towards more democratic and individual rights and freedoms
2) Toward less democratic and individual rights and freedoms
Essentially, this force would act along an axis where the two directions above would define the two extremes of the axis.
One extreme of the axis is defined by: greater individual freedom and freedom of expression, and greater democratic freedom and participation.
Scenarios at this extreme of the axis will exhibit:
Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the population
because democratic representation and freedom of expression enables citizens to have a say in where revenues go
Innovation
because individual freedoms and freedom of expression will enable more collaboration and sharing of ideas
Recognition of minority views
because minorities will have the freedom to express their views and to support those views with votes
Political dissent
because dissenters will have the freedom to express their views
Greater difficulty reaching consensus, more public deliberation and therefore relatively slow implementation of national policies
a greater variety of views, and greater recognition of minority views will inevitably make it more difficult to reach consensus e.g. greater difficulty in implementing difficult/controversial/unpopular policies
Emphasis of public benefit relative to national strategic interest
national strategic interest is prioritized by politicians and the military the public benefit is prioritized by average citizens greater individual freedom and democratic participation will enable average citizens to express and vote for their priorities e.g. less effectiveness in leveraging resources for national strategic interest; greater use of natural resources for public benefit
The other extreme of the axis defined by: lack of individual freedom, non-democratic, less democratic participation, censorship
Scenarios at this end of the axis will exhibit:
Utilization of natural resources for the benefit of the an elite
because lack of democratic representation and freedom of expression enables political and business elites to exercise greater control over revenues
Less innovation
Lack of individual freedoms and freedom of expression will inhibit collaboration and sharing of ideas
Less recognition of minority views
because minorities will lack the freedom to express their views and to support those views with votes
Less toleration of dissent
because dissenters will have the freedom to express their views
Greater ease in reaching consensus
Since fewer views are expressed or enforced by votes, consensus is easily reached by those in power
Less public deliberation and therefore relatively quick implementation of national policies
a smaller variety of views, and less recognition of minority views will inevitably make it easier to reach consensus from among a narrower range of options
e.g. greater ease in implementing difficult/controversial/unpopular policies
Emphasis of national strategic interest relative to public benefit
national strategic interest is prioritized by politicians and the military the public benefit is prioritized by average citizens less individual freedom and democratic participation will enable politicians and the military to implement policies in line with their own priorities e.g. greater effectiveness in leveraging resources for national strategic interest; less use of natural resources for public benefit